I grow weary of extremes.
I like to walk down the middle of the road. I like looking
at the scenery on either side of me. Sometimes I venture to the right because I
like something I see over there, and then there are times when I stroll over to
the left because something I see there resonates and makes sense. And in the
middle of the road where I walk, I find a comfortable, beautiful blending of
the two. I suspect there are a lot of people like me, but we are not often the
voices that speak the loudest.
Being a Mormon now, a faithful, church-going,
calling-holding member is a very interesting thing. A great majority of the
body of the Church is politically conservative. That leaves the minority
defined as liberal. But what of those of us who stroll down the middle and like
it there? Sometimes it feels like a very lonely place, because opinions tend to
be so incredibly polarized. And the implication is often that if your views
aren’t completely committed to either one side or the other, you’re an idiot.
Or a faithless rebel. Or a bigot.
When the early Church members made their trek west to settle
in Utah, it wasn’t as though that had been everyone’s first dream. I know, let’s
move all of us, many of whom will die, across this barren wasteland and settle
in a really ugly place with a large body of useless salt water smack in the
middle. (Which is now very pretty,
actually, because they planted a lot of stuff—thank you, ancestors.) They were
driven out of the U.S. That’s why they left.
They were murdered—children, even—tortured, raped, robbed,
their homes burned to the ground on top of them, their temples desecrated, their
printing presses destroyed, their belongings pawed through and stolen after
they were forced to flee. And there was an “Extermination Order” in Missouri,
which made it legal to kill a Mormon. They were treated in a way—in the United
States—that would spark horror in the minds and hearts of most of us today.
In 2000, my editor asked me if I’d be interested in writing
a Civil War series with an LDS perspective. So I wrote about the war and placed
one of my characters—an LDS convert—in the middle of it, along with parallel
stories about other family members and friends in different parts of the
country. I also wrote about a family of slaves who were literate, and their
struggles throughout the process. I
dared to include a bi-racial marriage and a whole lot of drama throughout four
volumes.
The research I did, which was extensive and exhausting, led
me to some impressions that still stick with me. The first was that literacy is
the key to freedom. How do you enslave a large portion of a population? You don’t
allow them education in any way, shape or form. Another impression that remains
with me is an understanding of the bitterness and weariness most of the early LDS church members felt toward the
country that had forced them out because of religious intolerance.
These are but two of the lessons I took away from the
experience, and they’ve come back to roost with me in a frustrating way this
election year. To preface this, I need to explain that I am an unapologetic member of my faith. I also appreciate the “liberal”
Joanna Brooks, author of Book of Mormon Girl, and the viewpoint she represents—most
of which I agree with. She’s well-spoken and bright, and I like her. She says
many things that resonate with me very deeply.
In writing the Civil War series,
I was steeped in research about bigotry, and to be an unapologetic member of an
organization that is now characterized as “bigoted,” I find horrifying. It does
not sit well with me. As much as I would like to distance myself from that
concept in any way, shape or form, I stand by my testimony of my faith and draw
strength from personal, spiritual experiences I’ve had that keep me attending
church week after week.
But frankly, what I do care if two people who love each
other are legally married? I don’t. How, then, to reconcile that with religion,
one you absolutely cannot reject or deny, or risk lying to yourself? The answer
is, for me, that I stay prayerful, and close to a God who loves his children. I
remain patient and watchful, and take comfort in the fact that He is very much
aware of what we do down here and that all questions are answered in time. And when I listen to people who profess to be
Christians, both in my church and without, who are so incredibly hateful in
their speech and actions, I remind myself that we are not perfect. That my
testimony of my faith is not based on its members. We are, however, here to
learn and grow and love. (Kumbaya, I know. I’ve already heard it.) But Christ,
during his recorded lifetime, preached a gospel of love, not hate. In fact, the only time he was angry was when
people were using His Father’s house to cheat. This tells me that despite what
we may believe, collectively or individually, about people whose lives are different
than our own, we damn well better be nice about it.
And as to the other thing—the weary early Church member
thing—I feel that in spades. Now no, I certainly have not been cruelly driven
from my home by a stampede of lawless ignorants. Nor have I personally felt the
barbs of prejudice because I am a Mormon. But wow, I’m tired. Tired of reading
news reports whose authors don’t even bother to get the facts straight. (It’s
not a Steak, it’s a Stake, and it represents a geographical collection of
Wards, or congregations—again organized geographically. Kind of like schools within a school district. A Stake President is
not a position of extreme authority over the entire body of the Church. Women
in the Church are not kept barefoot in the kitchen. We can read and have
college degrees and were voting in our church meetings before the rest of the
country’s women were constitutionally allowed to. And maybe if you would like
to know more about us, you should ask someone who is actually a member, not a
professor of a student who once was, or a friend of a friend who used to have a
Mormon neighbor.)
My issue of Time Magazine came in the mail with Mit Romney’s
face on it, talking about how his mind works, and it was all I could do to
bring it in the house. I just didn’t want to read anything else about how odd
we are, or how imperfect our LDS history is, the mistakes we’ve made, or the
incongruity between being a religion and a capitalistic “money making empire.”
And because Mit Romney is the Republican candidate and a
Mormon, the two have become inextricably linked, in many minds. Which is
frustrating for me, because the Republican Party is not The Church of Jesus
Christ of Latter-day Saints. Church
leadership repeatedly makes public statements
about its stance as politically neutral. On Facebook, on the Church website,
and from the pulpit. Do many of our LDS ideals fall in line with conservative
principles? Certainly. But…wait for it…there are also gospel principles to be
found on the left side of the road.
Speaking in sweeping generalities, I like the compassionate
vibe I feel from the Democratic Party. There’s a level of love and acceptance
within it that I find, on the surface at least, lacking on the Right. Still
speaking in the most general of terms and in relation to the Republican Party, I’ve
seen the value of self-reliance, of gaining an education and relying on one’s
own efforts, intellect and abilities to make a better life for one’s family. The
level of self-esteem that grows from these accomplishments is visible, vital
and crucial, and I’ve seen it work to the betterment of people’s lives, specifically
single moms I had the opportunity to work with some years ago as they earned
their GEDs and climbed out of the “system.”
As an
LDS writer in a tightly-knit community of fellow LDS writers, I’ve found
several similarities among many of us who walk down the middle of the road. J.Scott Savage said once that he is more liberal than most of his LDS friends,
and more conservative than most of his friends who are not LDS. This holds very
true for me, as well. I have a barrage of extremism on either side of the
political aisle assaulting me when I log on to Facebook. I. Am. So. Tired. Of.
Political. Messages. On. Facebook. I have news for you, my friends. Republicans
do not hate gay people. Democrats are not Satan.
Last
election year, a fellow writer and friend of mine, Annette Lyon, posted a commentary on her blog proclaiming her blood to be “purple,” or rather a
blending of red and blue. This rang so true to me I felt emotional about it. It’s
ok to see both sides of an issue. It doesn’t mean you’re weak, or spineless, or
unprincipled. It means…you see both sides of an issue. I believe things are
very rarely all black or all white. I suspect those with personalities opposite
mine (I’m a Myers-Briggs ENFP, because I know you were wondering) would argue
with me on that point.
And so as I continue to peruse Facebook and see links to
articles about Mormons, and memes depicting both Romney and Obama as horned
devils, I console myself with this thought: 2013 is not an election year, and
we’re almost there! Praise whatever deity you worship! Or not. :-)
2 comments:
Amen, Sister, Amen.
when i was in NY I was the most conservative. When I was in Utah, the most liberal (I am staunchly pro choice). I think there might be many of us closet purple bleeders, its just the squeeky wheels on either side of us always get the grease.
Post a Comment